本日は "バレンタイン=デー"。欧米の習慣によれば、恋人宛てに、熱い愛の囁き (メッセージ) をカードにたくして送る日。そこで、この日に因んで、間もなく迫る国立大学入試向けの (しゃれた) 英語の出題例 (記述問題) を受験生諸君へ送ろう。
出題問題: 恋人から、Valentine Card に添えて、"I LOVE YOU" というメッセージをもらった。 この恋人に、返信すべき英語 を、Two Words で、記述せよ!
ヒント: 目下、欧米では、過去に上司から「セクハラ」などを受けた被害者 (主に女性たち) が、こぞって「 」運動を始めた。その結果、(トランプ大統領を除く) 有名な映画監督や政治家が失脚し始めた。 この 「 」 に入る Two Words が正解である。
"PAK Research Center" (PRC) for Longevity
In March of 2015, we have set-up the first research lab of our "PAK Research Center" (PRC) in Okinawa, Japan. Our main goal of this lab is to develop a series of potent PAK1-blockers which would be useful for therapy of cancer and many other PAK1-dependent diseases such as Alzheimer's disease. PAK1 is the major oncogenic/ageing kinase, and blocking this kinase would lead to the extension of our healthy lifespan. We plan to move our research lab to S. Korea soon. Contact: maruta20420@yahoo.co.jp
2018年2月14日水曜日
2018年2月1日木曜日
2017 Lasker Award to Prof. Mike Hall, the Father of "TOR" (Target of Rapamycin)
Rapamycin is among antibiotics isolated by a Canadian team from a soil bacterium in Rapa, Nui, Easter Island, in 1975. Originally, its was recognized as an anti-fungal compound. However, later it was found to be a potent "immune suppressor" useful for organ transplantation. Interestingly, it has an anti-cancer activity as well. However, because of its immuno-suppressive activity, it has never been a favorable anti-cancer drug. To a big surprise, however, around 2009, Rapamycin was found by a US team led by Dr. David Harrison to extend significantly (by 9-14%) the lifespan of old (20 months) mice. Thus, it is among natural elixirs (longevity-promoters).
In 1991, a Swiss team led by Prof. Mike Hall at University of Basel (Biozentrum), identified its direct target, a kinase, in yeast. Since then, this kinase is called "target of rapamycin" (TOR), and a mammalian homolog of TOR is called mTOR. In other words, mTOR is an oncogenic/ ageing kinase, as is PAK1. Is TOR essential for melanogenesis as well, as is PAK1? According to 2016 article by a Taiwanese group, Hinokitiol (heptagonal ring compound) inhibits melano-genensis of B16F10 melanoma cells by inactivating mTOR. Thus, it is most likely that mTOR is a melanogenic kinase. The PAK1-blockers called ivermectin causes autophagy through PAK1-mTOR pathway, clearly indicating that mTOR is down-stream of PAK1.
However, according to 2012 article by a Korean group, rapamycin promotes melanogenesis, instead of suppressing it. Thus, there must be another target of rapamycin (called TOR2) in mammals, in addition to mTOR. Furthermore, KO (knock-out) of PAK1 promotes immune system, suggesting that PAK1 is immuno-suppressive, just like rapamycin. Thus, immuno-suppressive effect of rapamycin must be due to a third target called TOR3, which is not down-stream of PAK1. Therefore, for cancer therapy it would be desirable to develop a new rapamycin derivative which does not interact with TOR3.
Nevertheless, Prof. Mike Hall became a 2017 Lasker awardee. Thus, it is most likely that PAK1 pioneer(s) would also join the "Lasker Club" or "Nobel Club" in a not-distant future.
In 1991, a Swiss team led by Prof. Mike Hall at University of Basel (Biozentrum), identified its direct target, a kinase, in yeast. Since then, this kinase is called "target of rapamycin" (TOR), and a mammalian homolog of TOR is called mTOR. In other words, mTOR is an oncogenic/ ageing kinase, as is PAK1. Is TOR essential for melanogenesis as well, as is PAK1? According to 2016 article by a Taiwanese group, Hinokitiol (heptagonal ring compound) inhibits melano-genensis of B16F10 melanoma cells by inactivating mTOR. Thus, it is most likely that mTOR is a melanogenic kinase. The PAK1-blockers called ivermectin causes autophagy through PAK1-mTOR pathway, clearly indicating that mTOR is down-stream of PAK1.
However, according to 2012 article by a Korean group, rapamycin promotes melanogenesis, instead of suppressing it. Thus, there must be another target of rapamycin (called TOR2) in mammals, in addition to mTOR. Furthermore, KO (knock-out) of PAK1 promotes immune system, suggesting that PAK1 is immuno-suppressive, just like rapamycin. Thus, immuno-suppressive effect of rapamycin must be due to a third target called TOR3, which is not down-stream of PAK1. Therefore, for cancer therapy it would be desirable to develop a new rapamycin derivative which does not interact with TOR3.
Nevertheless, Prof. Mike Hall became a 2017 Lasker awardee. Thus, it is most likely that PAK1 pioneer(s) would also join the "Lasker Club" or "Nobel Club" in a not-distant future.
PAK family kinases come of age: Celebrating 40 years of discovery.
2018 Commentary to J. Cell Signal., accepted for publication (5/01/2018)
Hiroshi
Maruta, PAK Research Center, Melbourne, Australia.
e-mail: maruta20420@yahoo.co.jp
Introduction
Since our team at NIH found the very first
member of PAK family kinases (called “myosin I heavy chain kinase”) in a soil
amoeba in 1977 (1), this family of RAC/CDC42-dependent Ser/Thr kinases kept
expanding their territory during the last four decades. Among this unique family,
however, PAK1 has been most extensively studied so far, mainly because it is
essential for malignant trans-formation of mammalian cells, but non-essential
for normal cell growth (2), and shortens the healthy lifespan of small animals
such as C. elegans (3), and is
involved even in PDGF/a-MSH-dependent melanogenesis (4). For this reason, a variety of PAK1-blockers/inhibitors
have been developed or identified since the turn of this century, and some of
them such as propolis and 15K could be potentially useful for therapy of solid
tumors, promoting the longevity by suppressing a variety of other
PAK1-dependent diseases/disorders such as AD (Alzheimer’s disease),
hyper-tension and diabetes (type 2), and even for the cosmetic treatment of
hyper-pigmentation (so-called “skin-whitening”). Thus, the potential market
value of these PAK1-blockers would be huge in both pharmaceutical and cosmetic
industries. In this commentary, I shall briefly highlight the uniqueness of
PAK1-blockers useful for signaling therapy causing no serious side effect, in
contrast to conventional anti-cancer drugs such as DNA/RNA/microtubule
poisons which clearly cause serious side effects such as hair-loss, suppression
of immune system and loss of appetite. Rather surprisingly, these PAK1-blockers
such as propolis and 15K promote hair growth and boost even our immune system
(5, 6), easing the damaging side effects caused by conventional anti-cancer
drugs.
References
- Maruta H, Korn ED. Acanthamoeba cofactor protein is a heavy chain kinase (PAK) required for actin activation of the Mg2+-ATPase activity of Acanthamoeba myosin I. J Biol Chem. 1977 ; 252: 8329-8332.
- Maruta, H. Herbal therapeutics that block the oncogenic kinase PAK1: a practical approach towards PAK1-dependent diseases and longevity. Phytother Res. 2014 ; 28: 656-672.
- Yanase, S, Luo, Y, Maruta, H. PAK1-deficiency/down-regulation reduces brood size, activates HSP16.2 gene and extends lifespan in C. elegans. Drug Discov Ther. 2013; 7: 29-35.
- Be-Tu PT, Nguyen BC, Tawata S, Yun CY, Kim EG, Maruta H. The serum/ PDGF-dependent “melanogenic” role of the minute level of the oncogenic kinase PAK1 in melanoma cells proven by the highly sensitive kinase assay, Drug Discov. Ther. 2016. 10: 314–322.
- Nguyen BC, Taira N, Maruta H, Tawata S. Artepillin C and Other Herbal PAK1-blockers: Effects on Hair Cell Proliferation and Related PAK1-dependent Biological Function in Cell Culture. Phytother Res. 2016; 30: 120-127.
- Huynh N, Wang K, Yim M, et al. Depletion of p21-activated kinase 1 up-regulates the immune system of APC∆14/+ mice and inhibits intestinal tumorigenesis. BMC Cancer. 2017; 17: 431.
2017年8月26日土曜日
Minocycline (MC) is a PAK1/MLK-inhibitor:
Useful for therapy of brain tumors such NF
A brief review in “Brain Tumors” issue:
Is an old antibiotic “Minocycline” useful for NF therapy?
Hiroshi Maruta, PAK Research Center, Melbourne, Australia.
ABSTRACT:
So far no effective
FDA-approved drug useful for NF (neurofibromatosis) therapy is available on the
market. However, there emerged a good
possibility that an old antibiotic called “Minocycline” (MC) could be used
(prescribed) for NF therapy at least on a so-called “compassionate” ground.
Why? MC is a tetracyclin derivative, and
has been used for therapy of a variety of infectious diseases (including
cerebral malaria) as well as thrombosis during last 4 decades without any
serious side effect. Besides the generic drug MC is far less expensive than
Gleevec, the ABL/PDGFR/KIT-inhibitor, approved by FDA only for therapy of rare
cancers such as CML and GIST. Recently a number of both preclinical and
clinical studies strongly suggest that MC possesses a relatively strong
anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, anti-AIDS, anti-AD (Alzheimer’s disease), anti-PD
(Parkinson’s disease), anti-schizophrenia, anti-depressive, and
anti-melanogenic effects, all of which are closely associated with anti-PAK1
activity. Furthermore, it is obvious that, unlike FK228, MC passes effectively
through BBB (blood brain barrier). Most recently, there emerged a paper by a US
group clearly indicating that MC could be a direct PAK1-inhibitor, as is
CEP-1347. Lastly, it has been reported
that MC indeed inhibits the growth of MPNST (NF1-deficient cancer) cells. Thus,
it would be worth testing its anti-PAK1 activity in vitro first, and then its
anti-NF2 (tumor) activity in cell culture as well as in vivo (against human NF
tumor xenograft in mice) to get the FDA approval for NF therapy.
Discussion
Tetracyclin (TC) is an anti-bacterial
antibiotic developed in late 1940s, and inhibits the ribosome-based protein
synthesis in bacteria, but not in mammals.
Thus, it selectively kills pathognenic bacteria without any serious side
effect on mammals. However, bacteria gradually developed TC-resistance, and
therefore TC is no longer used nowadays for therapy of infectious diseases.
According to a recent
review on minocycline (MC), an old (long-lasting) TC derivative developed in
1961, the antibiotic MC has been successfully used for therapy of a wide
variety of infectious diseases and thrombosis as well for more than 4 decades
without any serious side effects (1).
However, since MC is now a “generic” drug, and is available on the
market extremely inexpensive (100 mg costs only 30 cents), if you take 100 mg
twice a day, it would cost you only 60 cents daily.
Furthermore, over 4 decade
study has revealed that MC can be used beyond the ordinal antibiotics killing
only pathogenic bacteria. A wide range
of other diseases appear to be among targets of MC (1), such as cancer, a
variety of inflammatory diseases, AD (Alzheimer’s disease), PD (Parkinson’s
disease), schizophrenia, depression, autism, obesity, hyper-pigmentation, and
so forth. All of these diseases/disorders are among typical PAK1-dependent
symptoms. Thus, there is a good possibility that MC is a PAK1-blocker.
In support of this notion,
just like CEP1347 that inhibits both PAK1 and MLK (2), MC inhibits thrombosis
(platelet aggregation) (3). Most
interestingly, MC enhances sleep and memory in clinical trials, clearly
indicating that unlike FK228, MC passes through BBB (blood brain barrier) (4).
In support of this notion, MC is effective for therapy of “cerebral” malaria in
mice as well (5). Thus, it is quite
possible that MC would be useful for therapy of brain tumors in general.
How about NFs
(neurofibromatosis type 1 and 2)? Sadly
so far no effective FDA-approved therapeutic is available on the market for NF
patients as yet, except for propolis, natural PAK1-blockers made by honey
bees. Very recently, a group in Taiwan
reported that MC is effective to suppress the growth of MPNST (Nf1-deficient
cancer) cells (6). Thus, like propolis such as Bio 30 from New Zealand which
has been successful for therapy of both NF1 and NF2 clinically, MC would be
potentially useful for NF2 therapy as well.
I should remind you that “Gleevec”, which blocks PAK1 by inhibiting Tyr-kinases (PDGFR/KIT), is also useful for NF therapy (7), but is very expensive. So MC could replace “Gleevec” soon.
I should remind you that “Gleevec”, which blocks PAK1 by inhibiting Tyr-kinases (PDGFR/KIT), is also useful for NF therapy (7), but is very expensive. So MC could replace “Gleevec” soon.
References:
1. Garrido-Mesa N, Zarzuelo A, Galvez, J. Minocycline: far beyond an
antibiotic. Brit. J. Pharmacol. 169 (2013). 337-352.
2. Neu TV, He, H. Hirokawa Y. et al. The K252a derivatives, Inhibitors
of PAK/MLK kinase family selectively block the growth of RAS transformants.
3. Joseph
W. Jackson, Affiliation Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester
Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America ⨯ Meera V. Singh, Vir B. Singh,
et al. Novel Antiplatelet Activity of Minocycline Involves Inhibition of
MLK3-p38 Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase Axis. PloS ONE 11 (2016), e0157115.
4. Besedovsky L, Schmidt
EM, Linz B, Diekelmann S, Lange T, Born J. Signs of enhanced sleep and
sleep-associated memory processing following the anti-inflammatory antibiotic
minocycline in men. J Psychopharmacol. 2017 ; 31(2): 204-210.
5. Apoorv TS, Babu PP.
Minocycline prevents cerebral malaria, confers
neuroprotection and
increases survivability of mice during Plasmodium berghei
ANKA infection. Cytokine.
2017 ; 90 :113-123.
6. Ko JC, Wang TJ, Chang
PY, et al. Minocycline enhances mitomycin C-induced cytotoxicity through
down-regulating ERK1/2-mediated Rad51 expression in human non-small cell lung
cancer cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 2015 ; 97(3): 331-40.
7. Mukherjee J, Kamnasaran
D, Balasubramaniam A, Radovanovic, Zadeh G, Kiehl TR, Guha A. Human schwannomas
express activated platelet-derived growth factor receptors and c-kit and are
growth inhibited by Gleevec (Imatinib Mesylate). Cancer Res. 2009 ; 69(12): 5099-107.
登録:
投稿 (Atom)